Zeqiri, Jetmire (2018) THE SENSE OF IRRESPONSIBILITY DUE TO THE MENTAL STATE OF THE PERSONS. JUSTICIA International Journal of Legal Sciences, 6 (10). pp. 52-60. ISSN 2545-4927
Text
6.pdf Download (12MB) |
Abstract
The irresponsibility institute represents the point of division between the subjects that will be considered accountable and the subject that cannot be subject to trial. Therefore the definition the concept of irresponsibility requires the individualization of the assumptions on which this category is based. Why does justice need the institute of irresponsibility? For what reasons are exempted persons who do not have the ability to understand the actions and consequences caused? This is one of the most difficult and controversial issues of criminal low. The establishment of irresponsibility relies on the problem of individual accountability, encountered ever, but never resolved. To give an answer question traditionally faced determinism and indeterminism. Even though most doctrines are oriented in favor of knowing the concept of self-determinism, or otherwise speaking of the concept of a person capable of acting by making free choice, there is still divergence as to the modalities in which this freedom is expressed.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
Divisions: | Faculty of Law, Arts and Social Sciences > School of Law |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email zshi@unite.edu.mk |
Date Deposited: | 05 Jun 2019 08:34 |
Last Modified: | 05 Jun 2019 08:34 |
URI: | http://eprints.unite.edu.mk/id/eprint/144 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |